Hello all,
Want to through an error message on click of the Manu Item button on a SalesTable Form if Sales Lines are not present for SalesId as soon as the button is clicked.
Where I can write code to do the above requirement and what code should I write to do that.
The screenshot is attached where the button is marked with red color.
Thank You
Siddhant
Hello Everyone,
I have this strange issue on my EP pages that referenced fields Like HcmWorker Name, HOD Names are showing RecID instead of the Name text and not allowed sign instead of Hod Name.
Note: This issue is appearing in multiple pages
This issue got resolved after restarting IIS and Sharepoint related services like.
1. IISAdmin
2. Sharepoint admin
3. SharePoint Timing services
4. Sharepoint tracing services
The above error reappears the very Next day.
Note: This is the Production environment and has 3 EP servers farms. This issue appears in one or two and some time in all the servers.
I check Event viewer and found out that there is one error which is repeating after every hour.
Here is the screenshot
Any SharePoint /EP expert Please help me in this regards.
Hello experts,
One of our clients uses cost group with Direct material, Direct manufacture and indirect manufacture cost.
But with some reasons, they didn't makr on defualt for Direct manufacture indirect manufacture.
So when I open the Cost group menu, I couldn't close it and I marked on Default on Direct manufacture & indirect manufacture.
After this, AX started to be super slow that even can't create a production order.
Do you have any idea what happen after marking default middle of using AX?
And have any solution to resolve this?
Please help
Tina
Hi Experts,
I hope this post finds you well.
I have sales return, when posting packing slip in intercompany i encounter this error.
Microsoft.Dynamics.Ax.Xpp.ErrorException: Exception of type 'Microsoft.Dynamics.Ax.Xpp.ErrorException' was thrown. at Dynamics.Ax.Application.FormletterService.Run() in FormletterService.run.xpp:line 220 at Dynamics.Ax.Application.FormletterService.Postsalesorderpackingslip(SalesFormLetterPackingSlipContract _contract) in FormletterService.postSalesOrderPackingSlip.xpp:line 14 at FormletterService::postSalesOrderPackingSlip(Object , Object[] ) at Microsoft.Dynamics.Ax.Xpp.ReflectionCallHelper.MakeInstanceCall(Object instance, String MethodName, Object[] parameters) at Microsoft.Dynamics.Ax.Xpp.DictClass.Callobject(String _methodName, XppObjectBase _Called, Object[] varArgs) at Dynamics.Ax.Application.SysOperationServiceController.Runoperation(Boolean _async) in SysOperationServiceController.runOperation.xpp:line 93 at Dynamics.Ax.Application.SysOperationServiceController.runServiceOperation(Object[] parameters) in SysOperationServiceController.runServiceOperation.xpp:line 22 at SysOperationServiceController::runServiceOperation(Object[] ) at Microsoft.Dynamics.Ax.Xpp.ReflectionCallHelper.MakeStaticCall(Type type, String MethodName, Object[] parameters) at Dynamics.Ax.Application.SysDictClass.invokeStaticMethod(Object[] _params) in SysDictClass.invokeStaticMethod.xpp:line 26 at SysDictClass::invokeStaticMethod(Object[] ) at Microsoft.Dynamics.Ax.Xpp.ReflectionCallHelper.MakeStaticCall(Type type, String MethodName, Object[] parameters) at Microsoft.Dynamics.Ax.Xpp.PredefinedFunctions.runAsInvoke(String className, String staticMethodName, Object[] parms, Object[]& exportInfolog)
Unfortunately, my development server is currently not available so i haven't debug yet.
Any response is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Hi guys,
Microsoft has released new update for SII feature which afects Spain (more details here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/4509918/spain-sii-validation-rules-change-from-october-1-2019-dynamics-ax-2012).
There is a hotfix to achieve this but I have one question:
It is just run the hotfix and compile the application + post configuration or it is something more sophisticated. I've receive odd feedback from my partner and I want to be sure.
thank you
Dear All,
I need some advice with the following. Recently we moved to new servers, which was done without any software upgrades, so application code is basically the same. There were no changes in any relevant parameters either, so the expectation was that the system will behave the same. Unfortunately after first Master Scheduling in the new environment a curious (and highly problematic to us) thing happened regarding Net requirements. Inventory blocking transactions, the ones created manually using Inventory and Warehouse Management>Periodic>Inventory blocking feature, started recognizing only one (physical reservation) transaction and totally ignoring the receipt transaction (created due to Expected receipts being checked)
In our old environment, as well as in our Acceptance environment, since the inventory transaction’s Expected Date on both of them is the same, they cancel each other out and are ignored by MRP (no entries on any of them in the ReqTrans), which is the way we like it. I should also mention that there were no customizations in this area.
Unfortunately in the new Production environment MRP recognizes the physical reservation , showing it as a Stock journal reqTrans, (which I know is OK). This issue pegs against the On-hand (which is also OK). The problem is however that it ignores the expected receipt, leaving us with ‘fake requirement’ that can lead to unnecessary purchasing.
As mentioned – no changes in setup or code. There are also no batches involved – this is the simplest possible item with Site, Warehouse, Location and nothing else. This problem applies to all blocked items, so it is not item specific. After a day of chasing the root cause I ran out of ideas. Any suggestions on where to look further?
Hello , Could you please help me ,
This work was right , untill i change the table and the datasource in the form ,
I was working with WHSDedouanementType , and i just create a copy from this table called WHSDedouanementType_Ref ,
So this error appeare when i do that .
Need Your Helps
Thnx
Hi,
Please could I ask some advice on extended marking, I’m not sure if the following issue is the norm for AX or if it’s a set up issue.
We recently started to use the extended marking function when firming planned orders, all looked fine until we deleted a pick ticket either certain lines or in its entirety (this includes partial pick, reducing consumption). The problem is once the pick ticket/line has been removed the marking also removes and on checking looks like its marked to itself (a ? symbol is against the line in the marking table), its almost like a ghost mark as its not actually marked to anything. The line then needs to be re-marked. This is a problem as we have a particularly large BoM’s, containing subs, phantoms etc.
I’m not certain but I think it might be how the Lot-ID is being used by AX.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thank you,
Hi All,
We've implemented the line level 'Cancel' for Return order and when we try to perform 'Complete' on return order form currently it will fetch the returns total,charges,tax etc. for all the lines but we need to modify this logic so that 'Canceled' status should not included in the calculation for return order complete.could you help me in achieving this ?
Hi All.
I have a small requirement as , I have a base enum and that enum is used in a form and The Enum has 65 Literals in it.
But i want to show only 10 Literals on a particular form for that combo box .
How can i hide the remaining Literals in D365 F&O
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
K
I know you can set parameters to have a production order RAF when the last operation is ended. The problem with this is that AX uses the warehouse location set on the production order. We would like the user to be able to specify the warehouse location before the production order is RAF. It would be very good if the RAF journal could automaticly be opened, not automaticly posted as it is in standard AX. Is there a parameter to have the system open the RAF journal when the last operation is ended?
/Henrik
In standard sales order cycle delivery remainder gets updated (Ordered quantity - Reserved quantity) after delivery note is posted. But my client needs to update delivery remainder after sales order confirmation (Considering after SO confirmation the sales line would become non-editable). I believe that incorporating this requirement might affect some standard processes.
Is it advisable to deviate standard SO process behavior this way? It would be great if by any chance you have an idea of the impacts of this customization.
Thanks in advance.
I try to import and create released product with entity Released products creation V2
For the first import it worked fine. Now I created a second list with OTHER products (Product and item number not used yet) and this import fails telling me:
File contains duplicate rows, cannot insert data into staging due to unique key violation
There are no duplicated rows in the file and as I said Itemnumber and product number is unique
How can I solve this issue
Hi every body
I create load with loadbuilding work bench.
just show me this message.I want to know that how can i handle this message?
"Loads are created for the proposed loads. You can view the loads in the Load planning workbench form."
"The load building session is in an unexpected state. The state of the session is Loads proposed, but it must be Loads created."
Thanks
Sepideh
We are running a special promotion to allow customers to get a discount if orders meet a certain dollar amount. I want to enter and add the discount at the order level. Can you provide any info on how to set up? I have a discount set up for a specific customer group which is working great but want to now set up and enter at the time the order is entered.
Hello everyone,
Just needing some information around how best to design a workflow in our CRM which has a sms sent to a customer, apposed to making a call.
Cheers Ben
Hello guys,
In Pending vendor invoices, when you click a Vendor Invoice, it shows that the Match Variance is okay (Checked), but why does the Last Match status still show Warning? Is this a normal occurrence or is this a bug somewhat?
Hi all,
I would like to be able to reconcile the sales invoice number and value against the costs used to generate that invoice in a GL account. The invoices I am talking about are recharge sales invoices. Currently we post costs to an intercompany suspense account. These costs come from different parts of the system. They include timesheets, purchase invoice costs, and expenses. I would like to be able to offset the invoice value against the costs. Obviously the individual costs that have been posted to the system have their own voucher number and other reference numbers, and the sales invoice has its own reference number as well. But can or does the system mark the already posted costs in some way so as to be able to net the invoice values and costs, so as to be able to clear down the transactions in a reconciliation.
I have personalised the GL account pulling in all possible fields that might provide a reference that I can identify with in the 'Project management and accounting' module where the sales invoices are prepared. But I am unable to find a link with the personalisation in any area in this part of the system. I have looked in inquiries, and reports and other part of the system in the Project module.
Has anyone else had this issue? If so how did you find a solution? or is there no solution? Is it a setup issue?
Any and all help would be much appreciated.
Many thanks!
Jason.
